CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive

CSS | Past Paper | Group 4 | 2021 | Part 2 | Descriptive

Below is the solution to PART-II (COMPULSORY) of the CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive (Part 2).

Question 2

What were the political and ideological differences among Non-Jurors, High Churchmen and Latitudinarians?

Introduction

The late 17th and early 18th centuries in Britain were filled with religious and political debates. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, three major religious groups emerged in the Church of England: Non-Jurors, High Churchmen, and Latitudinarians. Each had its own beliefs, political leanings, and attitude toward the monarchy and the Church.

Who Were the Non-Jurors?

The Non-Jurors were a group of clergy and churchmen who refused to swear allegiance to William III and Mary II after James II was overthrown.
They believed in the “divine right of kings”, meaning God gave the king the right to rule.
In their view, James II was still the legal king.
They lost their church positions for not taking the oath.

Ideology:

Strongly supported monarchy and traditional church authority.
Believed in the unity of Church and State.
Rejected the idea that Parliament could remove a king.

Politics:

They were Royalists and Jacobites (supported the return of James II or his heirs).
Opposed to the new government after 1688.
Stayed out of politics mostly, but their ideas influenced later conservative thinking.

Who Were the High Churchmen?

High Churchmen supported the Church of England but accepted William and Mary as rulers.
They emphasized ceremonies, sacraments, and church traditions.
Wanted to keep the Church strong and separate from other Christian groups.

Ideology:

Believed in the authority of the bishops and clergy.
Opposed religious tolerance for Dissenters (like Puritans or Catholics).
Viewed the Church as a key part of national life.

Politics:

Mostly supported the Tory party.
Believed in a strong link between monarchy and Church.
Though they accepted the new monarchy, many still had sympathy for the old one.

Who Were the Latitudinarians?

They were the most liberal of the three groups.
Believed religion should be more practical and open-minded.
Focused on reason, morality, and tolerance instead of strict doctrine.

Ideology:

Wanted to reduce conflict in the Church by allowing wider interpretation of beliefs.
Supported science, education, and progress.
Less focused on church ceremonies.

Politics:

Supported the Whig party, which backed Parliament and constitutional monarchy.
Favored religious tolerance for Dissenters.
Close to Enlightenment ideas and modern thinking.

Comparison Table

Group	Political Leaning	View on Monarchy	Church Beliefs	Religious Tolerance
Non-Jurors	Royalist	Pro-James II	High Church, traditional	Strongly opposed
High Churchmen	Tory	Pro-William III (reluctantly)	Traditional Anglican, ceremonial	Opposed
Latitudinarians	Whig	Pro-William III	Broad-minded, reason-based	Supported

Conclusion

The Non-Jurors, High Churchmen, and Latitudinarians all played an important role in shaping British religious and political life. Their differences reflected deeper struggles between tradition and change, monarchy and parliament, and intolerance and tolerance. Understanding them helps explain the changing identity of Britain after the Glorious Revolution.

Question 3

What were the political and constitutional causes and consequences of the Act of Union 1707?

Introduction

The Act of Union 1707 was a major historical turning point. It united England and Scotland into one kingdom called Great Britain. Before this, both had the same monarch but separate parliaments, laws, and governments. This union was not only a political decision but also came with deep constitutional changes.

Political Causes of the Act of Union

Fear of Separate Monarchs
- After Queen Anne, there were worries that Scotland might choose a different successor, creating a split in the British Isles.
- England wanted to avoid the return of a Catholic monarch in Scotland.
Security Reasons
- England feared that Scotland could ally with France, a strong Catholic enemy.
- A United Kingdom would be stronger against European threats.
Scottish Political Weakness
- After many failed wars and political instability, Scotland lacked power to act independently.
- Some Scottish elites believed union would bring peace and order.
English Political Goals
- England wanted to control Scottish decisions and secure its northern border.
- Union was a way to centralize power and stop Scottish rebellions.

Constitutional Causes of the Act of Union

Succession Issue
- England passed the Act of Settlement 1701, allowing only Protestants to rule.
- Scotland disagreed, and this caused a big constitutional clash.
Different Parliaments
- Two separate parliaments were seen as a problem for unity.
- Union would create one Parliament of Great Britain, ending division.
Failure of Scottish Economy
- The Darien Scheme, a failed Scottish colonial project, left Scotland financially broken.
- Union promised economic help and access to English markets.

Consequences of the Act of Union 1707

1. Creation of Great Britain

The union created the new country of Great Britain with one monarch and one parliament in Westminster.

2. End of Scottish Parliament

The Scottish Parliament was dissolved, and Scottish MPs joined the British Parliament in London.

3. Economic Benefits

Scotland got access to English trade and colonial markets.
Though many common Scots didn’t benefit at first, the long-term effect was economic growth.

4. Nationalism and Resistance

Many Scots felt betrayed, and there were protests and rebellions, especially by the Jacobites.
The feeling of Scottish identity remained strong.

5. Legal and Religious Differences Remained

Scotland kept its own legal system and national church (Presbyterian), showing that the union was more political than cultural.

Conclusion

The Act of Union 1707 was the result of both political fears and constitutional problems. It brought peace and strength to Britain but also created tensions that still exist today, like Scottish independence movements. While it united the kingdoms under one flag, it didn’t fully unite the people, and its impact is still felt in modern UK politics.

Question 4

Provide a detailed account of the causes of World War I and its effects on the social and economic aspects of Britain.

Introduction

World War I (1914–1918) was a massive conflict that started in Europe but affected the whole world. Britain played a leading role in this war. It started due to many political tensions and alliances. The war had huge impacts on British society and economy, changing the country in many ways.

Causes of World War I

1. Alliance System

Europe was divided into two major alliances:
- Triple Entente: Britain, France, Russia
- Triple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy
These alliances created a tense environment where a conflict between two countries could drag all others into war.

2. Militarism

Countries, especially Germany and Britain, were building huge armies and navies.
The arms race, especially between the British Royal Navy and German Navy, increased suspicion and fear.

3. Nationalism

Many European nations had strong nationalist feelings.
Slavic groups in the Balkans wanted freedom from Austria-Hungary.
Germany wanted to prove its power; Britain wanted to keep its empire safe.

4. Imperialism

European powers were competing for colonies in Africa and Asia.
This created rivalries between Britain, France, and Germany.

5. Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand

In 1914, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne was assassinated in Sarajevo.
Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.
Alliances pulled other nations into the war, and soon World War I began.

Social Effects of WWI on Britain

1. Loss of Life and Trauma

Around 1 million British soldiers died.
Almost every family lost someone.
A whole generation of young men was affected, causing deep sorrow and depression.

2. Change in Role of Women

With men at war, women entered factories, offices, and farms.
They proved they could do men’s jobs, which helped in gaining women the right to vote in 1918.

3. Class Structure Shaken

The war brought rich and poor together in battle.
Social barriers started to break down, and working-class people gained more respect.

4. Rise of Labour Movements

Workers began demanding better rights, wages, and working conditions.
Labour Party gained support after the war.

Economic Effects of WWI on Britain

1. Huge War Debt

Britain spent billions on the war and borrowed heavily from the USA.
After the war, the country was deep in debt and had to pay it back over many years.

2. Decline of British Industry

War production had replaced normal trade and industry.
After the war, factories were outdated, and Britain struggled to compete with USA and Germany.

3. Unemployment and Inflation

After soldiers returned, many couldn’t find jobs.
Prices of food and goods rose, leading to economic hardship for the common people.

4. End of British Economic Dominance

Before the war, Britain was the world’s top economy.
After the war, the USA became the leading economic power.
Britain’s empire began to weaken slowly.

Conclusion

World War I was a turning point for Britain. It started due to long-term causes like militarism and alliances. The war led to major social changes, especially for women and the working class. Economically, it left Britain weaker and in debt, marking the beginning of the end of its global power. The war not only changed Britain but also reshaped the whole world.

Question 5

What is the Edwardian era? Elucidate the rise and significance of the Labour Movement in the Edwardian era.

Introduction

The Edwardian era refers to the period of King Edward VII’s reign (1901–1910), but in history, it is often extended up to 1914, just before World War I. This was a time of social change, political awareness, and rising tensions between classes in Britain. One of the most important developments of this time was the rise of the Labour Movement, which started to challenge the power of the upper class and fight for workers’ rights.

What is the Edwardian Era?

Named after King Edward VII, son of Queen Victoria.
Known for being less strict than the Victorian age.
Society was more relaxed, but class divisions were still strong.
Rich people lived in luxury, while working-class people faced poverty and poor conditions.
Science, technology, and transport improved during this time.
It was also a time of political awareness and rise of democratic ideas.

Rise of the Labour Movement in the Edwardian Era

1. Industrial Revolution’s Long-Term Effects

Many workers were employed in factories, mines, and mills, often in terrible conditions.
There was no proper system for wages, hours, or safety.
The working class started organizing to demand better treatment.

2. Trade Unions Growth

Trade unions became stronger and more organized during this era.
Workers began to strike and protest to demand fair wages and rights.
By early 1900s, unions had millions of members.

3. Formation of the Labour Party (1900)

The Labour Representation Committee was formed in 1900, which later became the Labour Party.
It aimed to represent workers in Parliament, unlike the Conservatives and Liberals.
In 1906 general elections, Labour won 29 seats, marking the start of its political journey.

4. Role of Working-Class Leaders

People like Keir Hardie played a major role in promoting workers’ rights.
They gave voice to the poor and encouraged people to fight for social justice.

5. Support from Socialists and Liberals

The Labour Movement got support from Fabian socialists and some left-wing liberals.
They all wanted to end poverty, improve education, and bring health reforms.

Significance of the Labour Movement in the Edwardian Era

1. Gave Political Power to the Working Class

For the first time, working-class people had their own party in Parliament.
They could now influence laws and policies.

2. Social Reforms

Labour pressure forced the Liberal government to introduce welfare reforms, like:
- Old Age Pensions Act (1908)
- Labour Exchanges Act (1909)
- National Insurance Act (1911)

3. Created Political Awareness

Common people began to understand that they could change the system by voting and organizing.
There was a rise in working-class consciousness and unity.

4. Prepared Ground for Future Reforms

Though Labour was still small in this era, it laid the foundation for becoming a major party later.
After WWI, Labour became one of the main political forces in Britain.

Conclusion

The Edwardian era was a time of change and awakening. While the rich enjoyed luxury, the poor started fighting for their rights. The Labour Movement rose as a symbol of hope for the working class. It challenged the traditional system and led to major reforms that shaped modern Britain. The seeds sown in this era later helped Labour become a powerful voice in British politics.

Question 6

What was the Falkland Islands conflict? Why Did the British invade the Falkland Islands and how this war came to an end?

Introduction

The Falkland Islands conflict was a short but intense war between Argentina and Britain in 1982. It lasted for about 10 weeks and was fought over the control of the Falkland Islands, which are located in the South Atlantic Ocean. Though small, this conflict had major political and military effects for both countries.

Background of the Falkland Islands Conflict

The Falkland Islands had been under British control since 1833, but Argentina claimed them as part of its territory.
Argentina called them “Islas Malvinas” and believed they were wrongly taken by Britain.
The people living on the islands were mostly British descendants, and they wanted to stay under British rule.

Why Did the Conflict Start?

1. Argentine Invasion (2 April 1982)

On this date, Argentine forces invaded and occupied the islands, believing Britain wouldn’t respond strongly.
The Argentine military government hoped this move would gain public support at home.

2. British Response

Britain saw the invasion as a threat to its sovereignty and pride.
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher reacted strongly and sent a task force of ships and troops to take the islands back.

Why Did Britain Invade the Falkland Islands?

1. To Defend Sovereignty

Britain considered the islands its territory. Losing them without a fight would be seen as a sign of weakness.

2. To Support the Islanders’ Wishes

The people living on the Falklands wanted to remain British. Britain claimed it was defending their right to self-determination.

3. To Maintain Global Reputation

As a former empire, Britain wanted to show the world that it still had military power and political will.
It also wanted to protect other territories from future invasions.

How the War Came to an End?

1. Naval and Air Battles

British forces launched sea and air attacks.
British ships, like HMS Sheffield, were hit, but Argentina lost many planes and ships.

2. Ground War

British troops landed on the islands in May 1982.
After heavy fighting, especially around Port Stanley, the Argentine forces surrendered on 14 June 1982.

3. British Victory

Britain regained full control of the islands.
Over 900 soldiers died, including around 649 Argentinians and 255 British.

Aftermath of the War

1. Political Effects in Britain

The victory increased Margaret Thatcher’s popularity, helping her win the 1983 elections.

2. Fall of Military Government in Argentina

The defeat embarrassed the Argentine junta and led to the return of democracy in Argentina.

3. Military and Security Changes

Britain increased its defense of the islands after the war.
A permanent military base was established there.

Conclusion

The Falkland Islands conflict was a war over a small piece of land, but it had big consequences. It showed Britain’s determination to defend its territories and marked the end of Argentina’s military rule. Though the war was short, it changed the political future of both countries and still affects UK-Argentina relations today.

Question 7

What is the contribution of Great Britain in the formation of the European Common Market and European Union? Also, highlight its impact on the foreign policy of Britain.

Introduction

After World War II, European countries started working together to build peace and economic growth. This led to the formation of the European Common Market and later the European Union (EU). Although Britain didn’t join at the beginning, it played an important role later on. Britain’s relationship with the EU deeply affected its foreign policy, trade, and global position.

Britain’s Role in the Formation of the European Common Market and EU

1. Early Hesitation (1950s)

The idea of a united Europe began with the European Coal and Steel Community (1951) and the Treaty of Rome (1957).
These created the European Economic Community (EEC) or Common Market.
Britain didn’t join at first. It preferred its own trade group, the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).

2. Reasons for Staying Out

Britain feared losing its sovereignty.
It wanted to protect ties with the Commonwealth nations.
British leaders didn’t believe the EEC would succeed.

3. Application and Entry into EEC (1973)

After realizing the success of the Common Market, Britain applied to join in the 1960s but was vetoed by France under Charles de Gaulle.
Britain finally joined the EEC in 1973 under Prime Minister Edward Heath.
A referendum in 1975 confirmed that the public supported remaining in the EEC.

4. Participation in EU Treaties

Britain helped shape several key EU agreements:
- Single European Act (1986) – created a single market.
- Maastricht Treaty (1992) – formed the European Union. Britain joined political parts but opted out of the Euro currency.
- Lisbon Treaty (2007) – Britain supported some reforms but still demanded special treatment in many areas.

Impact on Britain’s Foreign Policy

1. Shift from Empire to Europe

Joining the EEC marked a major shift in foreign policy.
Britain moved focus from Empire/Commonwealth to Europe.
It had to adjust its trade, immigration, and diplomacy.

2. Special Relationship with the US

Britain balanced its EU membership with its strong bond with the United States.
Sometimes this caused tension, as EU countries didn’t always support US-led actions, like the Iraq War.

3. Conflicted Role in Europe

Britain often wanted economic benefits without full political integration.
It did not join the Schengen Zone (free travel) or adopt the Euro.
This led to constant debates at home about leaving the EU.

4. Brexit and Withdrawal (2016–2020)

In 2016, a public referendum resulted in a vote to leave the EU.
Britain officially left the EU on 31 January 2020.
This caused major changes in Britain’s foreign policy:
- Need to make new trade deals.
- Return to more independent diplomacy.
- Strain in relations with EU countries.

Conclusion

Britain was not a founding member of the European Common Market, but it played a strong role in the EU after joining. Its contributions were mostly economic, but it always kept some distance from deeper political unity. Britain’s membership in the EU changed its foreign policy by shifting its focus from empire to Europe. However, this relationship remained uneasy, leading to Brexit, which marked a new chapter in British foreign policy.

Question 8

What were the salient features of Tony Blair’s policy on the War on Terror? How did his policy affect US-Britain relations?

Introduction

After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the United States launched the War on Terror to defeat global terrorism. Tony Blair, the Prime Minister of Britain at that time, became one of the strongest supporters of the US in this war. His foreign policy took a new turn, and Britain played a major role in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Salient Features of Tony Blair’s War on Terror Policy

1. Strong Alliance with the US

Blair believed in a “special relationship” with America.
He fully supported President George W. Bush’s actions after 9/11.
Britain joined the military invasion of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003).

2. Belief in Global Responsibility

Blair promoted the idea that strong nations had a “moral duty” to act against terrorism and dictatorship.
He said the world should not stand by when human rights were being violated.

3. Focus on Regime Change in Iraq

Blair supported the removal of Saddam Hussein, claiming he had Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs).
Even though no WMDs were found, Blair defended the decision, saying it made the world safer.

4. Military Intervention as a Tool for Peace

Blair believed military action could bring democracy and peace in unstable countries.
He followed the idea of “liberal interventionism”, meaning wars could be justified for moral reasons.

5. Domestic Security Measures

Inside Britain, Blair introduced strong anti-terrorism laws, like surveillance and detention of suspects.
These moves were criticized for reducing civil liberties.

6. Media and Public Relations

Blair’s government used media campaigns to gain support for war.
But later, many documents (like the “Dodgy Dossier”) were seen as exaggerated or misleading.

Effects on US-Britain Relations

1. Strengthened the Alliance

Blair’s full support in the War on Terror brought the UK and US closer than ever.
The two countries worked together in military, intelligence, and diplomacy.

2. “Poodle” Image in Media

Some critics said Blair followed the US too closely, calling him “Bush’s poodle”.
Many believed Britain lost its independent foreign policy.

3. Public Backlash and Protests

There were massive protests in Britain, especially before the Iraq War in 2003.
People felt Blair ignored public opinion just to please the US.

4. Damage to Blair’s Reputation

The Chilcot Inquiry (2016) later said the war in Iraq was based on flawed intelligence.
Blair’s image suffered, and many people lost trust in his leadership.

5. Long-term Impact on Foreign Policy

After Blair, future British leaders became more cautious about military involvement.
The Iraq War made Britain think twice before joining future US-led wars.

Conclusion

Tony Blair’s policy on the War on Terror was marked by strong US support, belief in military intervention, and moral responsibility. While it strengthened ties with America, it also caused huge criticism at home. His decisions led to long wars, loss of life, and a lasting debate on Britain’s role in global conflicts. Blair’s foreign policy changed how Britain saw itself and how the world saw Britain.

📘 Benefits of Practicing This Descriptive Paper

✅ These CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive questions are compiled from authentic FPSC CSS past papers, following the real written exam format.
💬 Attempting this CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive helps students master structured writing and analytical skills for CSS exams.
🧾 Every question in this CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive strictly follows the official CSS exam syllabus approved by FPSC.
📊 Students preparing for CSS 2021 can rely on this CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive to practice time management and topic selection.
🔍 The solved CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive contains concise explanations to improve conceptual understanding and writing clarity.
🎯 Regular revision of this CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive builds confidence and strengthens your preparation for the CSS written paper.
🏆 This CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive is essential for mastering exam techniques and achieving success in the FPSC CSS 2021 examination.

Download CSS Past Paper 2021 – British History

🏁 Final Note

Keep revising these CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive to strengthen your grip on important concepts and improve accuracy in upcoming CSS exams. Regular practice with these CSS Past Paper 2021 British History Descriptive will help you score higher and build full command over the CSS exam syllabus.

📰 Check out other years’ past papers of British History.

🔗 Check FPSC past papers directly from the official FPSC website.

Post Views: 386