CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive (Part 2)
CSS | Past Paper | Group 6 | 2025 | Part 2 | Descriptive
Below is the solution to PART-II (COMPULSORY) of the CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive (Part 2).
Question 2
Critically analyze the remedies available for the breach of contract under the Contract Act, 1872. In your analysis, discuss the role of compensatory damages, the limits of specific performance and the challenges faced in enforcing contracts in Pakistan’s legal and business environment. How does the principle of anticipatory breach apply in Pakistan, and what challenges might arise in proving such a breach in the local courts?
Introduction
Under the Contract Act, 1872, when a contract is broken by any party, the law provides some remedies to the innocent party. These remedies are to protect the rights of the party who suffers loss and to make sure justice is done. The main types of remedies in case of breach are compensatory damages, specific performance, injunctions, and rescission of contract.
Compensatory Damages
This is the most common remedy. When one party breaks the contract, the other party gets compensation for the loss caused due to the breach. These are given under Section 73 of the Contract Act. The damages must be:
- Direct result of the breach (not too remote),
- Measurable in money,
- Proved with proper evidence.
For example, if a seller fails to deliver goods on time, and the buyer had to buy from market at higher rate, he can claim the difference.
But in Pakistan, sometimes it’s hard to calculate exact loss or provide strong evidence, so people don’t always get fair amount.
Specific Performance
This is given under the Specific Relief Act, 1877, but linked with the Contract Act too. It means that the court orders the party to actually do what was promised in the contract.
This is mostly allowed:
- In sale of land or rare items,
- When damages are not enough to cover the loss.
But specific performance is not given in all cases. There are limits, like:
- If the contract is personal in nature (e.g., singing, acting),
- If performance becomes impossible,
- If it’s unfair or one-sided contract.
In Pakistan, due to court delays and long procedures, people sometimes avoid asking for this remedy.
Challenges in Enforcement in Pakistan
Enforcing contracts is not always easy in Pakistan due to:
- Slow legal system: Cases take years to get decided.
- Lack of awareness: Many people don’t know their legal rights.
- Corruption: In some cases, the process is not fully transparent.
- Business practices: Many agreements are made verbally or without proper documents.
This makes even a simple breach very hard to prove in courts.
Anticipatory Breach
This means when one party clearly refuses or shows he will not perform the contract even before the due date. This is covered under Section 39 of the Contract Act, 1872.
When this happens, the other party can either:
- Treat the contract as broken right away and claim damages, or
- Wait until the due date to see if the party performs or not.
Example: If A agrees to supply goods to B on 15th Jan, but on 1st Jan says he won’t do it, B can sue him right away.
In Pakistan, proving anticipatory breach is challenging, because:
- It must be very clear and not just a misunderstanding,
- Courts require strong proof like written refusal or emails, which people often don’t have,
- There’s a risk: if the innocent party files early and court decides there was no breach, they might lose the case.
Conclusion
The Contract Act, 1872 gives good remedies for breach like damages and specific performance. But in Pakistan, these are not always easy to get because of slow courts and weak enforcement. Anticipatory breach is also a good principle but hard to prove sometimes. To improve this system, laws need better implementation and courts should work faster so that justice can be given quickly and fairly.
Question 3
Critically analyze the concept of implied authority of a partner and the doctrine of holding out under the Partnership Act, 1932. In your analysis, discuss how the implied authority of a partner to bind the firm in transactions, even those beyond the express agreement, impacts the liability of partners in a partnership. How does the doctrine of holding out protect third parties, and what are the potential challenges in applying this doctrine in modern business practices?
Introduction
The Partnership Act, 1932 defines the rights, duties, and responsibilities of partners in a partnership business. Two important concepts in this law are implied authority and the doctrine of holding out. These help to manage business smoothly and also protect outsiders who deal with the firm.
Implied Authority of a Partner (Section 19)
Implied authority means that a partner can act on behalf of the firm even without express permission, if the act is usual in that type of business. It is assumed that each partner can make decisions that are normally required in daily business operations.
Example: A partner in a trading firm can buy goods, borrow money, sign bills, etc., without asking others, unless there is restriction.
Impact on Liability
- All partners become jointly liable for acts done under implied authority.
- Even if one partner does something risky, the whole firm has to face the result, unless the third party knew the partner had no authority.
- This can be dangerous in some cases where trust is misused.
However, Section 19(2) lists acts outside implied authority, like:
- Submitting disputes to arbitration,
- Opening bank accounts in own name,
- Admitting liability in lawsuits, etc.
These require express permission from other partners.
Doctrine of Holding Out (Section 28)
This rule protects third parties who believe someone is a partner of a firm, even if he actually isn’t, but the person or the firm allowed others to think he is.
Example: If Mr. A lets others call him a partner in a firm and doesn’t correct them, and someone gives credit to the firm because of this, Mr. A will be liable as a partner.
Conditions for Applying Doctrine
- There must be representation (by words or actions),
- The third party must believe that person is a partner,
- The third party must act upon that belief (e.g., give loan).
This doctrine is important because it stops fraud and unfair behavior. But it also creates risk for people who are falsely shown as partners.
Challenges in Modern Business
In today’s complex business environment, both concepts face some problems:
a) Implied Authority Challenges
- Businesses are now global and involve online operations.
- It’s hard to decide what is “usual” act in some firms.
- Misuse of authority can cause huge losses to the firm.
- Internal restrictions on partners are sometimes not known to outsiders.
b) Holding Out Challenges
- With social media and online platforms, people are often wrongly presented as partners.
- Third parties may misunderstand someone’s role in a firm.
- Proving that someone was “holding out” as a partner is also difficult sometimes.
Still, the doctrine is helpful to protect innocent outsiders, who rely on what they see or are told by the firm.
Conclusion
The implied authority allows smooth working of partnership by letting partners act without needing approval every time. But it also creates risk for the firm if misused. The doctrine of holding out protects third parties from being cheated, but must be applied carefully. In modern business, these concepts are still useful but need more awareness and clear communication to avoid problems.
Question 4
Critically analyze the special rules of evidence under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, with particular reference to the presumption of validity and the burden of proof in cases involving negotiable instruments like promissory notes and cheques. How do these provisions impact the rights of the drawer, holder, and endorser in cases of dishonor or dispute?
Introduction
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is a key law that deals with instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. One of the important features of this law is that it provides special rules of evidence to make transactions faster and more secure. These rules help in handling dishonor cases, fraud, and recovery of money.
Presumption of Validity (Section 118)
The law says that courts should assume certain things to be true unless proved otherwise. This is called presumption. In the case of negotiable instruments, some main presumptions are:
- That it was made or drawn for consideration,
- That it was accepted and signed properly,
- That every transfer was made before maturity,
- That it was endorsed in order and legally,
- That the holder is a holder in due course.
This helps the holder a lot because he does not need to prove everything in court at the beginning.
Example: If someone files a case for a bounced cheque, the court will assume the cheque was given for a valid reason. The accused (drawer) must prove otherwise.
Burden of Proof
Due to this presumption, the burden of proof falls on the drawer or the person who is denying the instrument. They have to prove:
- That there was no consideration,
- That the signature is forged,
- That the instrument was stolen or altered,
- Or that it was already paid.
This makes it easier for the holder to file a claim and more pressure on the accused to defend themselves.
But the accused can give strong evidence like bank statements, witnesses, or written agreements to shift the burden back to the holder.
Impact on Drawer, Holder, and Endorser
- Drawer: If a cheque bounces, the drawer faces civil and even criminal liability under Section 138 of the Act. He must prove he had no bad intention, or the cheque was misused. Otherwise, he may face fine or jail.
- Holder: The law supports the holder. He can recover the amount quickly because of the presumption of validity. If he is a holder in due course, he gets more protection.
- Endorser: If the cheque is transferred through endorsement, and the cheque is dishonored, the holder can sue both the drawer and the endorser. But the endorser also has some rights, like asking for notice of dishonor.
So, all parties in the chain have to be careful and honest.
Challenges in Real Practice
Although the rules are strong, in Pakistan there are many challenges:
- Delays in courts: Even simple cheque cases take years to finish.
- False cases: Sometimes, people file fake cases using old or blank cheques.
- Lack of digital proof: In many cases, people don’t keep proper records, so proving payment or non-payment is difficult.
- Misuse of presumption: Honest drawers suffer if they don’t have enough proof to defend.
Due to these reasons, even a good law can sometimes be misused or delayed.
Case Example (For Understanding)
If Mr. A gives a cheque to Mr. B for Rs. 500,000 and the cheque bounces, Mr. B can go to court. The court will assume Mr. A gave it for valid consideration. Now Mr. A has to prove if the cheque was stolen or already paid. If he fails, he will be held liable.
Conclusion
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, provides very helpful rules of evidence. The presumption of validity and the shifting of burden of proof helps honest holders and protects commercial trust. But in practice, the system needs better enforcement and fast disposal of cases to make the law more effective. Still, it plays a very important role in Pakistan’s banking and business world.
Question 5
Critically analyze the provisions related to the transfer of shares under the Companies Act, 2017, particularly focusing on the restrictions and procedures for the transfer of shares in private companies. How do the provisions balance the interests of the company, the shareholders, and third parties in ensuring that share transfers are both fair and efficient? Evaluate the challenges faced by shareholders in the transfer process, especially in light of the legal requirements for board approval and the pre-emption rights of existing shareholders.
Introduction
The Companies Act, 2017 governs the formation, management, and functioning of companies in Pakistan. One important area under this law is the transfer of shares, especially in private companies, where stricter rules apply compared to public companies. These rules are made to protect both the company and its existing shareholders, while also keeping the process fair for outsiders.
Transfer of Shares in Private Companies
Under Section 46 and 47 of the Companies Act, private companies have the right to restrict the transfer of their shares through their articles of association. This is because private companies usually have a small number of members, and they want to keep control within a known circle.
The restrictions can be:
- Board approval is required before transfer,
- Pre-emption rights, meaning existing shareholders must be offered the shares first,
- No transfer to outsiders unless approved.
This helps in avoiding unwanted persons becoming part of the company.
Procedure for Transfer
The basic steps for share transfer include:
- Offer to existing shareholders (if pre-emption applies),
- Submission of share transfer form along with share certificate,
- Approval by the Board of Directors,
- Updating the register of members after approval.
This process can take time and depends on how fast the board decides.
Balancing Interests
The law tries to balance three main interests:
a) Company
- The company gets control over who can become a shareholder.
- It helps in maintaining internal trust and company’s privacy.
b) Shareholders
- Existing shareholders are protected through pre-emption rights.
- They get first chance to buy shares before they go outside.
c) Third Parties
- Third parties (new buyers) are not completely blocked, but they need to go through the process.
- This ensures that the transfer is legal and fair.
So, the law keeps things smooth but with safety checks.
Challenges in Share Transfer
Even though the law is clear, in real life, many issues come up:
- Delays by the board: Sometimes, board of directors’ delay approvals without reason, which creates frustration for the seller and buyer.
- Oppression of minority shareholders: If a majority group controls the board, they can refuse transfer to block competition or personal dislike.
- Lack of transparency: Some companies don’t clearly write their restriction clauses in articles, leading to confusion.
- Conflict in valuation: If pre-emption applies, existing shareholders may disagree on price, which causes disputes.
- Legal costs: If rejected unfairly, the seller may go to court, but the process is expensive and time-taking.
All these make the transfer process less efficient, especially for minority shareholders.
Suggestions to Improve
- SECP should issue guidelines for fair approval process.
- Companies should clearly mention all restrictions in articles of association.
- Time limit should be added in law for board to decide on transfer requests.
- Use of online portals for faster record updating can make things smoother.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2017 gives private companies power to control share transfers, but also protects the rights of shareholders through pre-emption and fair process. However, in practice, some shareholders face problems due to board delays and unfair practices. There is a need to improve enforcement and transparency to make the share transfer process both fair and efficient for all.
Question 6
Critically analyze the legal framework governing contracts between consumers and providers under the Consumer Protection Act, 2006. How does the Act ensure that consumer rights are protected in contracts, particularly with regard to the provisions on misrepresentation, defective goods, and unfair trade practices? Evaluate the effectiveness of the Act in addressing power imbalances between consumers and providers, especially in cases of standard form contracts where consumers have limited bargaining power. Does the Act provide adequate remedies for consumers in case of breach of contract, and how do these provisions influence the behavior of businesses in terms of compliance and consumer satisfaction?
Introduction
The Consumer Protection Act, 2006 is a major law in Pakistan that protects consumers from unfair business practices. It provides a legal framework to ensure that contracts between buyers and service providers are fair, and that consumers’ rights are not violated.
In a country like Pakistan where many consumers are unaware of their rights, this law plays a big role in creating balance between the buyer and seller.
Protection from Misrepresentation
Misrepresentation is when the seller gives false information about the product or service to trick the buyer. The Consumer Protection Act makes this illegal.
If a company advertises that a product has a feature which it doesn’t, or gives fake performance guarantees, the consumer can file a complaint.
This helps stop false ads and makes businesses more honest in how they present their products.
Defective Goods and Services
The law says that every product sold must be of acceptable quality, and services must be performed with reasonable care.
If a product is broken, expired, or not working properly, the consumer can demand:
- Replacement
- Repair
- Refund
Same goes for services – if a service is done poorly, the consumer can take legal action.
This helps in building trust in the market.
Unfair Trade Practices
The Act bans many unfair practices like:
- Overcharging beyond printed price
- Selling banned or unsafe products
- False labeling
- Hoarding and black marketing
If any such practice is done, the business can be fined or punished. This discourages businesses from cheating customers and protects the market system.
Standard Form Contracts and Power Imbalance
Many times, companies give pre-written contracts to consumers (like in mobile service, insurance, online shopping), and the consumer has no option to change anything — it’s either taken it or leave it.
This is called standard form contract, and it creates power imbalance, because the provider makes all the rules.
The Consumer Protection Act doesn’t completely stop this, but it tries to protect the consumer by saying that unfair terms (like no refund, or no complaint allowed) can be challenged in court.
Still, more awareness and legal reform is needed to handle these contracts better.
Remedies Available to Consumers
The Act gives different types of remedies in case of breach:
- Compensation for financial or physical loss
- Refund or replacement of goods
- Fine on business who broke the law
- Orders to stop unfair practice
Consumer can go to Consumer Court, which is faster than normal courts. But in real life, the system is still slow and not always accessible to poor or less educated people.
Effect on Business Behavior
The Act encourages businesses to:
- Be careful in advertising,
- Improve customer service,
- Use fair terms in contracts,
- Solve complaints quickly to avoid court cases.
This helps in increasing consumer satisfaction and building long-term business reputation.
But some businesses still ignore the law because punishments are not strict or enforcement is weak in many areas.
Challenges in Enforcement
- Lack of awareness among consumers,
- Weak implementation in rural areas,
- Delays in Consumer Courts,
- Low penalties that don’t scare big companies,
- Corruption and red-tape in complaint process.
Due to these, even a strong law becomes weak in practice.
Conclusion
The Consumer Protection Act, 2006 is a good step to protect consumer rights in Pakistan. It covers misrepresentation, defective goods, and unfair trade. It also tries to fix the power imbalance in contracts, but more needs to be done.
To make it more effective, the government should focus on awareness, strict enforcement, and modernization of consumer courts. This way, businesses will follow the law better, and consumers will feel safer and more respected.
Question 7
“With the rise of digital communication and e-commerce, the Electronic Transactions Ordinance 2002 has played a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape of electronic contracts and digital signatures in Pakistan.”
Discuss the key provisions of the Electronic Transactions Ordinance 2002, focusing on the legal recognition of electronic records and signatures, as well as the role of certification authorities. Critically evaluate the effectiveness of this Ordinance in addressing issues of security, authenticity, and reliability in digital transactions. What challenges remain in its enforcement, particularly in the context of Pakistan’s evolving digital economy?
Introduction
The Electronic Transactions Ordinance (ETO), 2002 was made to provide a legal framework for electronic documents, contracts, and signatures in Pakistan. Since online communication, e-commerce, and digital banking are growing fast, this law plays a key role in making sure digital transactions are legal, safe, and recognized in courts.
Before this law, electronic contracts and emails were not valid in the eyes of the law, which made online business risky and uncertain.
Legal Recognition of Electronic Records
Section 3 of the Ordinance says that if something is required by law to be in writing, then even an electronic record (like an email or scanned agreement) will be accepted as valid.
This is very useful for:
- E-commerce websites,
- Online banking,
- Emails and PDF contracts,
- Online job offers and digital receipts.
So now, businesses and consumers don’t need to print and sign everything on paper, which makes the process faster and easier.
Recognition of Digital Signatures
Under Section 7, the law accepts digital signatures as valid if they are:
- Reliable,
- Done using a proper method,
- Able to verify the identity of the signer.
This means a person can sign a document using a digital certificate or encryption key, and that signature will be as good as a handwritten one.
This makes online agreements and e-payments more trustworthy.
Role of Certification Authorities
To make sure digital signatures are not fake, the law talks about Certification Authorities (CAs).
These are licensed organizations that:
- Issue digital certificates,
- Verify the identity of users,
- Keep records of who signed what.
The Electronic Certification Accreditation Council (ECAC) is the main body that approves and regulates CAs in Pakistan.
This builds a system of trust, where people and businesses can rely on digital signatures and know they are secure.
Security, Authenticity & Reliability
The ETO helps in ensuring:
- Security: Digital signatures are hard to forge if done properly.
- Authenticity: It proves that a message or contract really came from the sender.
- Reliability: Digital records can be saved and used in court as proof.
This gives confidence to people using online banking, mobile apps, and e-commerce websites.
Challenges in Enforcement
Even though the law is good, there are still many challenges, especially in Pakistan:
a) Lack of Awareness
Many people and even businesses don’t know that digital contracts and e-signatures are legal. So they still prefer paper documents.
b) Weak Infrastructure
Proper CAs and digital systems are missing in many areas. Rural areas have no access to such services.
c) Cybersecurity Issues
Hackers, phishing scams, and data theft are rising. The ETO alone cannot stop these crimes. We need updated cybercrime laws and proper IT security.
d) Outdated Technology
The Ordinance was made in 2002. Technology has changed a lot since then (like blockchain, cloud systems, e-wallets), but the law has not been updated much.
e) Poor Implementation
Courts and government departments are still not fully digital. Many contracts are rejected because officials don’t accept digital forms, even though the law allows them.
Suggestions for Improvement
- Update the law to cover modern digital tools.
- Train judges, lawyers, and officials about digital laws.
- Make digital signatures more accessible to the public.
- Strengthen ECAC and increase the number of CAs.
- Improve cybersecurity laws along with ETO.
Conclusion
The Electronic Transactions Ordinance, 2002 was an important step to support digital business and online contracts in Pakistan. It gives legal status to electronic records and signatures, and helps build trust in e-commerce. But due to old technology, low awareness, and weak enforcement, its full potential is not achieved yet.
For Pakistan to grow in the digital world, this law needs to be updated and implemented better so people feel safe doing business online.
Question 8
“The Competition Act 2010 seeks to promote fair competition in Pakistan by prohibiting and regulating abusive marketing practices that can distort market dynamics and harm consumer welfare.”
Discuss the provisions related to the prohibition of deceptive marketing practices and abuse of marketing practices under the Competition Act 2010. Critically evaluate the role of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) in enforcing these provisions and ensuring compliance. What are the challenges in curbing deceptive marketing practices in Pakistan, and how might regulatory enforcement be improved to promote fair competition and protect consumers in both traditional and digital markets?
Introduction
The Competition Act, 2010 was passed to encourage fair business competition in Pakistan and stop companies from using unfair or abusive tactics to fool consumers or harm their competitors. One of the main goals of this law is to deal with deceptive marketing practices, false advertising, and other unfair strategies that damage market fairness and consumer trust.
The law is enforced by a body called the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP).
Deceptive Marketing Practices (Section 10)
Under Section 10 of the Act, companies are not allowed to:
- Make false or misleading claims about their products,
- Hide important information that a consumer needs,
- Do bait advertising, where they advertise something cheap to attract buyers but don’t actually sell it,
- Copy the logo, packaging, or branding of another company to confuse customers.
For example, if a juice company says their drink is “100% natural” but uses chemicals inside, that is a deceptive marketing act under this law.
This section helps protect consumers from being cheated and stops unfair advantage in business.
Abuse of Dominant Position (Section 3)
Sometimes, big companies use their power to destroy competition. This is called “abuse of dominance”.
Under Section 3, it is illegal if a company:
- Charges unfairly high prices,
- Forces retailers to not sell competitor’s products,
- Refuses to deal with certain people to damage rivals,
- Dumps products below cost just to kick competitors out.
These actions hurt small businesses and kill healthy competition, so the Act bans such behaviour.
Role of Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP)
The CCP is the main authority to enforce the Act. Its roles include:
- Investigating complaints,
- Conducting market research,
- Imposing penalties on guilty businesses,
- Issuing guidelines to educate businesses and consumers,
- Holding hearings and giving decisions.
CCP has taken many actions, like:
- Fining milk companies for false labeling,
- Acting against telecom companies for misleading ads,
- Warning beauty product sellers for fake promises.
This shows that CCP is active, but it still faces many challenges.
Challenges in Curbing Deceptive Practices
Despite the law, unfair marketing is still common in Pakistan because of:
a) Weak Consumer Awareness
Most people don’t know their rights or how to report a fake product or ad.
b) Lack of Digital Monitoring
Online ads, social media influencers, and fake websites are hard to track and regulate.
c) Slow Legal Process
Even if CCP gives a decision, companies go to courts and delay enforcement.
d) Limited Resources
CCP doesn’t have enough manpower and tools to cover all sectors.
e) Cultural Habits
Many sellers think it’s okay to exaggerate or lie in ads. It’s considered “normal marketing”.
Improving Enforcement & Consumer Protection
To stop deceptive marketing and promote fair competition:
- Strengthen CCP with more powers and funds,
- Start consumer awareness campaigns in schools, TV, and social media,
- Create a fast-track system for serious violations,
- Force companies to clearly label products with honest info,
- Monitor online platforms using AI tools to detect misleading ads,
- Give rewards to whistleblowers who report fraud.
Digital Market Protection
With rise of e-commerce in Pakistan, it’s even more important to act. Fake ads on Instagram, TikTok, and online stores often misguide buyers, especially youth.
CCP must work with PTA and e-commerce platforms like Daraz and Foodpanda to monitor fake sellers and remove them quickly.
Conclusion
The Competition Act, 2010 is a strong law to stop dishonest marketing and promote fairness in business. The CCP is doing a good job, but needs more support to deal with modern challenges, especially in the digital economy. If the law is fully enforced, it will protect consumers, improve product quality, and make Pakistan’s economy more honest and competitive.
📘 Benefits of Practicing This Descriptive Paper
- ✅ These CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive questions are compiled from authentic FPSC CSS past papers, following the real written exam format.
- 💬 Attempting this CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive helps students master structured writing and analytical skills for CSS exams.
- 🧾 Every question in this CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive strictly follows the official CSS exam syllabus approved by FPSC.
- 📊 Students preparing for CSS 2025 can rely on this CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive to practice time management and topic selection.
- 🔍 The solved CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive contains concise explanations to improve conceptual understanding and writing clarity.
- 🎯 Regular revision of this CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive builds confidence and strengthens your preparation for the CSS written paper.
- 🏆 This CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive is essential for mastering exam techniques and achieving success in the FPSC CSS examination.
🏁 Final Note
Keep revising these CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive to strengthen your grip on important concepts and improve accuracy in upcoming CSS exams. Regular practice with these CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law Descriptive will help you score higher and build full command over the CSS exam syllabus.
👉 Also read CSS Past Paper 2025 Mercantile Law (Part-I MCQs)
📰 Check out other years’ past papers of Mercantile Law.
🔗 Check FPSC past papers directly from the official FPSC website.
